home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT1068>
- <title>
- Apr. 24, 1989: Finally, The Belushi Story
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Apr. 24, 1989 The Rat Race
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- SHOW BUSINESS, Page 90
- Finally, the Belushi Story
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Wired heads for the theaters despite Hollywood's hostility
- </p>
- <p> From the moment his body was found in a Hollywood hotel room
- in March 1982, the victim of a drug overdose at age 33, John
- Belushi became the subject of an inevitable barrage of media
- scavenging. First came the newspaper stories, detailing the
- cocaine and heroin abuse that led to the Rabelaisian comic's
- early death. Then a book, Wired: The Short Life and Fast Times
- of John Belushi, written by Watergate chronicler Bob Woodward.
- The tell-all tome implicated several of Belushi's Hollywood
- friends and associates for condoning, or at least ignoring, his
- self-destructive behavior.
- </p>
- <p> The next step in the media onslaught, of course, is the
- movie. But that is where this Hollywood story hit a snag. Plans
- for a film version of Wired were set in motion more than four
- years ago. But problems in getting financing delayed the
- shooting until last summer. And not until last week, after
- months of turndowns, did the producers find a company willing to
- distribute the film. The stumbling block, say Wired's backers,
- was a Hollywood community that closed ranks against a picture
- it wanted to squelch. Says Woodward, an adviser on the film: "A
- large portion of Hollywood didn't want this movie made because
- there's too much truth in it."
- </p>
- <p> At the heart of this conspiracy drama is the specter of the
- powerful Creative Artists Agency, headed by superagent Michael
- Ovitz. Ovitz was Belushi's agent, and his company's star-packed
- client list includes several of the comedian's friends who were
- angered by Woodward's book, among them fellow Saturday Night
- Live star Dan Aykroyd, SNL producer Lorne Michaels and brother
- Jim Belushi. Reluctance to alienate Ovitz and his clients,
- claim the film's producers, is what frightened most of Hollywood
- away. "In this town," says co-producer Edward Feldman (Save the
- Tiger, Witness), "the word was put out that this was a project
- not to be touched."
- </p>
- <p> While admitting that he had reservations about the film "to
- the extent that it would be exploitative," Ovitz denies that he
- led a campaign to suppress it. "This movie will rise or fall on
- its own merits," he says. "There is nothing anyone can do to
- stop it." Bolstering his argument is the fact that the film,
- for all its troubles, has found a distributor: Atlantic
- Entertainment Group, an independent company that has handled
- such films as Teen Wolf and Wish You Were Here. Some contend
- that Wired's producers are simply trying to generate
- controversy over a bad film with poor box-office prospects. "The
- only thing that the producers have to hang on to is the image
- of Wired as `the movie that Hollywood tried to stop,' " says
- Bernie Brillstein, Belushi's former manager. "I think this is
- a very good plan to get some excitement for the movie."
- </p>
- <p> As a commercial project, Wired has its problems. Belushi,
- the brilliant, volatile star of Saturday Night Live and films
- like National Lampoon's Animal House, has become a posthumous
- icon, a symbol of the raucous counterculture comedy that
- Saturday Night Live spearheaded in the '70s. But cinematic
- tales of drug abuse (Less Than Zero, Clean and Sober) have
- fizzled at the box office, and Wired is an especially downbeat
- example. What's more, with Belushi's work so vividly remembered
- (and still widely available in TV reruns), a movie re-creation
- might seem morbidly gratuitous, even by Hollywood standards.
- </p>
- <p> Nor does the film offer the easy pleasures of a conventional
- movie bio. Earl Mac Rauch's script mixes fantasy and fact in an
- ambitious, if muddled, attempt at surrealistic psychodrama. In
- the opening scene, the dead Belushi (played by newcomer Michael
- Chiklis) wakes up in a morgue, escapes in a gown resembling the
- toga he wore in Animal House and meets a guardian angel in the
- guise of a taxi driver (Ray Sharkey). Their conversations are
- intermingled with time-jumbled flashbacks of Belushi's life,
- snippets of his comedy material and scenes of Woodward pursuing
- the story.
- </p>
- <p> The film tiptoes around much of Woodward's most sensational
- material. Missing, for example, is a portrayal of such Hollywood
- stars as Robin Williams and Robert De Niro, reported in the book
- to have used cocaine with Belushi. Except for Aykroyd (Gary
- Groomes), Belushi's wife Judy (Lucinda Jenney) and Cathy Smith
- (Patti D'Arbanville), the woman who allegedly gave Belushi his
- fatal drug injection, most real-life characters are given
- pseudonyms, and none are shown indulging in drug use with
- Belushi. Only a couple of scenes offer hints that Hollywood
- might share any blame in Belushi's death. In one, Woodward asks a
- studio executive about the $2,500 a week reportedly paid to
- Belushi for drugs. In another, a Belushi assistant admits that
- he gave the star uppers before a recording session.
- </p>
- <p> The book was so widely disliked in Hollywood that Woodward
- found little interest when he sought to peddle the movie rights
- in 1984. Feldman and his partner, Charles Meeker, eventually
- bought the rights for a relatively modest $300,000. They
- started feeling pressure almost immediately. Attorneys
- representing several Creative Artists clients and other Belushi
- colleagues, like director John Landis (The Blues Brothers),
- wrote letters warning that portraying them in the film would be
- an invasion of privacy. Ovitz himself phoned, says Feldman, and
- "told me it wasn't a good idea to make this picture." (Ovitz
- says he was simply giving Feldman "friendly advice" that "a lot
- of people we deal with -- clients and nonclients -- really
- didn't want to see John's memory exploited.") In the summer of
- 1986, Jim Belushi stormed into Feldman's editing room at
- Paramount, trashed his desk and told the secretary, "Tell him
- I was here." (Her reply: "Who are you?")
- </p>
- <p> When no Hollywood studio came through, Feldman and Meeker
- got backing from a New Zealand company, Lion Screen
- Entertainment Ltd. The producers put up $1 million of the
- film's $13 million budget themselves. They hired Larry Peerce
- (Goodbye Columbus) to direct and chose Chiklis, a little-known
- New York actor, for the lead role after auditioning more than
- 200 aspirants. Following several delays, shooting began last
- May.
- </p>
- <p> When the producers started showing their finished film to
- studio executives, the response was another collective cold
- shoulder. "It becomes a matter of power," contends Feldman. "
- `We didn't want you to make this movie, and you did. Now you're
- going to suffer.' " Studio executives scoff at Feldman's
- conspiracy charges. "We passed on the movie because it was
- totally uncommercial and pretentiously arty," says one. Yet
- several prospective deals seemed to dissolve suspiciously,
- including one with New Visions Pictures, an independent company
- headed by director Taylor Hackford.
- </p>
- <p> Now, however, Atlantic Entertainment has come to the rescue
- and is making plans for a July or August release. Then Wired can
- finally be judged by the people it was intended for: the
- audience. But repercussions from the unpopular project may not
- be over. Actor J.T. Walsh, who plays Woodward in the film, was
- set to appear next in Loose Cannons, a comedy co-starring Dan
- Aykroyd. According to insiders, Walsh was let go after just one
- day on the set, to avoid upsetting Aykroyd. All of which may
- simply set the stage for another round of the Belushi media
- blitz. Anyone for The Making of Wired?
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-